Intermediaries legislation (IR35)
The CIOT has responded to HMRC’s request for proposals to improve the effectiveness of IR35, including transferring liability from the personal service company (PSC) to the engager and changing the
The CIOT has responded to HMRC’s request for proposals to improve the effectiveness of IR35, including transferring liability from the personal service company (PSC) to the engager and changing the
LITRG, the ATT and CIOT responded to an HMRC consultation which proposed removing home-to-work travel and subsistence tax relief for a worker engaged through an employment intermediary and who is s
Most tax cases concern just a single issue or, occasionally, two distinct issues.
I am often asked: ‘What is so “alternative” about alternative dispute resolution (ADR)?’ The answer is simple.
It has been over a decade since I started writing a monthly case analysis for Tax Adviser. In that time, I have steadfastly avoided writing about a case in which I was instructed.
Anyone reading this will no doubt think that tax is fascinating. If you are a judge in the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court you will probably think otherwise.
The first judicial review decision on accelerated payment notices (APNs) was in the case of Rowe and Others v RCC [2015] EWHC 2293 (Rowe), which was handed down in the summer.
Much, I suspect, to the bemusement of the organisers, the attendance at the CIOT residential conferences can be variable. Sometimes demand seems to be high; in other years there are vacancies.
With the end of the Liechtenstein disclosure facility (LDF) and data exchange from offshore jurisdictions courtesy of the common reporting standard looming, it is likely HMRC will identify more cas